On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Russell Bryant
<russell(a)russellbryant.net> wrote:
On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 2:49 PM, Russell Bryant
<russell(a)russellbryant.net> wrote:
> On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 1:17 PM, Andrew Beekhof <andrew(a)beekhof.net> wrote:
>> Lets see if we need to add any more.
>> For one function, the overhead is simply not worth it.
>
> glib is already a dependency though, isn't it? I know I've at least
> seen the glib hash table being used. So it's not really just one
> function. :-)
Oh, and the glib mainloop stuff too.
... and now I feel stupid since I mixed up glib and gnulib. In any
case, glib is already being used and it has a function that will work
fine for this, g_strdup_printf(), which is already used in the code
base.
--
Russell Bryant