On 10/06/2011 10:28 AM, Adam Stokes wrote:
On Wed, 05 Oct 2011 18:15:41 -0400 Russell Bryantrbryant@redhat.com wrote:
- Code coverage
It would be nice to have an idea of the code coverage from these tests. I've used lcov [1] before and it worked quite well. I think we should integrate it at some point.
Thanks,
i doubt it matters but is lcov still being maintained?
I have no idea. As long as it works, it doesn't matter much. Do you know of any alternatives?