Hi :), After a few delays I've been able to set down today to work on the AWS CLI article. The good part is that I think the main structure is there and a lot of examples (both the command and the result) are present. The bad part is that I feel as if it's missing something, but I'm not really sure what that something is. What's your idea? Should I enlarge some parts? Should I explain better some concepts? Should I add some things? I really hope to read your feedbacks :)
Fale
On 02/25/2016 11:28 AM, Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote:
Hi :), After a few delays I've been able to set down today to work on the AWS CLI article. The good part is that I think the main structure is there and a lot of examples (both the command and the result) are present. The bad part is that I feel as if it's missing something, but I'm not really sure what that something is. What's your idea? Should I enlarge some parts? Should I explain better some concepts? Should I add some things? I really hope to read your feedbacks :)
Hi Fale!
We reviewed the article at the meeting tonight. We decided it looks good and we're intending for it to be published Monday. I'm going to help with editing and plan on tackling that tomorrow. Paul is going to create the featured image for the article by Sunday evening.
I didn't give everything a *super* hard look yet, but I will be going over it either Friday or sometime on the weekend. The content seemed strong, but I will let you know if there is anything that seems missing or could use clarification.
Thanks for putting this together for us, and if you don't have them already, feel free to ping me for badges after this article is published. :)
-- Cheers, Justin W. Flory jflory7@gmail.com
On 26 February 2016 at 05:45, Justin W. Flory jflory7@gmail.com wrote:
On 02/25/2016 11:28 AM, Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote:
Hi :), After a few delays I've been able to set down today to work on the AWS CLI article. The good part is that I think the main structure is there and a lot of examples (both the command and the result) are present. The bad part is that I feel as if it's missing something, but I'm not really sure what that something is. What's your idea? Should I enlarge some parts? Should I explain better some concepts? Should I add some things? I really hope to read your feedbacks :)
Hi Fale!
We reviewed the article at the meeting tonight. We decided it looks good and we're intending for it to be published Monday. I'm going to help with editing and plan on tackling that tomorrow. Paul is going to create the featured image for the article by Sunday evening.
I didn't give everything a *super* hard look yet, but I will be going over it either Friday or sometime on the weekend. The content seemed strong, but I will let you know if there is anything that seems missing or could use clarification.
Thanks for putting this together for us, and if you don't have them already, feel free to ping me for badges after this article is published. :)
Seeing as I've made very extensive use of Fale's package this week thought I'd give it a look over.
Content is great - anyone should be able to step through his examples and it gives a nice introduction to the toolset.
The only criticism I have is that in the preview the 'terminal' stuff has white text on a cream background (with the black of the terminal behind that of course) which makes it really hard to read.
On 02/26/2016 04:16 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
Seeing as I've made very extensive use of Fale's package this week thought I'd give it a look over.
Content is great - anyone should be able to step through his examples and it gives a nice introduction to the toolset.
The only criticism I have is that in the preview the 'terminal' stuff has white text on a cream background (with the black of the terminal behind that of course) which makes it really hard to read.
Thanks for the technical +1, James! That helps considerably. :) As for the white text on the cream background, that's a small formatting issue. It won't be much trouble for me to clean that bit up over the weekend.
Thanks for chiming in.
-- Cheers, Justin W. Flory jflory7@gmail.com
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 09:16:10AM +0000, James Hogarth wrote:
On 26 February 2016 at 05:45, Justin W. Flory jflory7@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Fale!
We reviewed the article at the meeting tonight. We decided it looks good and we're intending for it to be published Monday. I'm going to help with editing and plan on tackling that tomorrow. Paul is going to create the featured image for the article by Sunday evening.
Thanks a lot :)
Content is great - anyone should be able to step through his examples and it gives a nice introduction to the toolset.
Thanks a lot :)
The only criticism I have is that in the preview the 'terminal' stuff has white text on a cream background (with the black of the terminal behind that of course) which makes it really hard to read.
Should be fixed now!
Best, Fale
On 02/26/2016 11:57 AM, Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote:
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 09:16:10AM +0000, James Hogarth wrote:
On 26 February 2016 at 05:45, Justin W. Flory jflory7@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Fale!
We reviewed the article at the meeting tonight. We decided it looks good and we're intending for it to be published Monday. I'm going to help with editing and plan on tackling that tomorrow. Paul is going to create the featured image for the article by Sunday evening.
Thanks a lot :)
Content is great - anyone should be able to step through his examples and it gives a nice introduction to the toolset.
Thanks a lot :)
The only criticism I have is that in the preview the 'terminal' stuff has white text on a cream background (with the black of the terminal behind that of course) which makes it really hard to read.
Should be fixed now!
Hi Fale,
Everything is polished up and ready to go for publication. Thanks again for working on this article.
You may notice you have a new badge in your account. ;) Ping me in another week or two and I can check in on how many views your article received and I can award the proper amount of badges for that as well.
-- Cheers, Justin W. Flory jflory7@gmail.com
marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org