Makes sense to me, Pete. I'll make sure that the
redhat.com blog post
has the same wording as the wiki - it might take until end of day but it
will get updated. Thanks for letting me know!
John Terrill
Corporate Communications
Red Hat
o: 1-571-421-8132 | c: 1-570-772-3286
Twitter @jterrill8 | Google Talk jterrill8
On 11/13/2013 12:09 AM, Pete Travis wrote:
On Nov 12, 2013 9:10 PM, "John Terrill" <jterrill(a)redhat.com
<mailto:jterrill@redhat.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi Pete,
>
> Apologies for getting back to you so late. I drafted this and
posted it; I tried to make it slightly different from the wiki so it
wasn't just a repost. That being said, I can change it to better
reflect the exact wording in the wiki draft.
>
> Thanks,
> John
>
>
Hey John,
Paraphrasing is fine with me - as long as it's accurate ;)
For thinp, think of it as overcommit capabilities for LVM. For
example, a guest might see a 20 GiB volume, but if it only uses 5GiB
of that, the host knows it has 15 GiB that can be put to use. That's
my half-informed take, anyway.
--Pete