On 01/18/2011 04:54 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 03:36:17PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Jan 2011 04:00:51 +0530
> Rahul Sundaram<metherid(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I would suggest:
>>
>> EPEL 6 packages is a complimentary and compatible add-on repository
>> and provides additional packages for RHEL 6 or compatible rebuilds
>> and does not replace any RHEL 6 packages. EPEL is a community
>> project maintained and supported by volunteers (via bugzilla and
>> mailing lists) as part of the Fedora Project and is not commercially
>> supported by Red Hat.
>
> Sounds good to me. :)
Englishy wordsmithing:
The collection of EPEL 6 packages is a complementary and compatible
add-on repository for RHEL 6 or compatible rebuilds. It provides
additional packages and does not replace any RHEL 6 packages. EPEL is
a community project, maintained and supported by volunteers via
Bugzilla and mailing lists. It is part of the Fedora Project and is
not commercially supported by Red Hat.
We should use "supplementary" instead of "complementary". There's
a
subtle difference in the meanings: the former connotes that a thing is
additional to the whole, whereas the latter connotes that the whole is
not complete without the thing.
Also, "Red Hat, Inc."?