On 08/06/2014 10:00 AM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: > On 08/06/2014 03:54 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 06, 2014 at 03:48:43PM +0200, Joe Brockmeier wrote: >>>> So, my idea here would be to do individual posts for each of the talks >>>> that we are going to cover at FLOCK. This approach will also make it >>>> easier to assign a specific talk to a writer so we don't have multiple >>>> people covering the same talk. >>> How do we feel about combining a few talks into one post? >>> I attended the keynote, a talk on QA and a talk on Copr so far today. >>> Already wrote up the keynote, but not sure I'm going to get a full post >>> out of the QA talk. Any strong objections to doing a post that looks at >>> more than one talk? >> >> I think combining them if they're related makes sense, but it's better to >> not combine QA and Coprs even if each result is short. (Headline the QA talk >> with the quote about Rawhide bugs _probably_ not being a demonic hand >> reaching out of the monitor to strangle you?) > > I must have missed that bit. I was thinking if we combine coverage we > might draw more attention to talks than shorter individual posts, but > whatever.
I did combos last year.... basically I did a brief synopsis for every talk, one blog post per day. Got really good coverage and every post got LWN coverage.
FWIW
~m -- marketing mailing list marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/marketing