On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 23:17 +0100, Benjamin Lewis wrote:
Marek Mahut wrote:
Karsten Wade wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-05 at 10:55 +0200, Stefan Held wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 05.06.2007, 10:47 +0200 schrieb Nicolas Mailhot:
Le Mar 5 juin 2007 10:32, Stefan Held a écrit : Red Hat Marketing and Legal wants no risk of confusion between RHEL and Fedora
This is why i said we maybe have to discuss this again.
Sorry, why is that a reason to discuss this again?
Trust me, i have recent and respectfull sources who said they think like i do.
I guess I'm a bit confused about the "not wearing a red fedora" rule for Ambassadors.
As for as I know, it's not only red hats but hats in general.
"... that we not connect hats, red in color or otherwise ..."[1]
This may actually pose a problem for me as I regularly (especially in the rain) wear a black fedora, and a few people have asked me if the fact I support Fedora is because of, or related to, this.
Not that I intentionally connect the two, but average folk still seem to make that link...
If one is linked to Fedora in any way, to be kindly asked to refrain from using symbols such as red hats sounds reasonable to me. I have a hard time believing though, that one just has to buy that *any* hat should be avoided. I mean, that's just something that some people wear. Starting to feel relieved that the much appreciated Linux firm isn't called Green Shirt, or Black Sandal? ;)
herman