On 22 April 2016 at 09:52, Paul W. Frields stickster@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 09:59:40AM -0400, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
Hi all,
Somehow despite me sending this last night - this was published. How can we prevent communication breakdowns like this in the future?
This was sent prior to or during the magazine meeting, if I'm not mistaken.
If there's *any* uncertainty around something like this, it should not be published.
Agreed, and it's incumbent on whoever schedules a post to confirm it's meant to go out. The bar is higher for articles about what we deliver, as opposed to helpful how-to articles. It's hard to see how a premature article like that would cause any issues, but clearly this one could.
From past experience on these sorts of things.. please spell out that this is 32-bit i386 and doesn't cover arm32 (not sure if there are cloud arm32 but people seem to freak out when the architecture is not mentioned).
Also, this was picked up by at least one venue that checks our feeds for reportable news: https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Fedora-Cloud-32-bit-...
Does someone have a contact with Phoronix so we could explain the snafu here?
-- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ The open source story continues to grow: http://opensource.com -- marketing mailing list marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/marketing@lists.fedoraproject.org