On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 6:27 PM, Christoph Wickert < christoph.wickert@googlemail.com> wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 14.10.2009, 19:15 +0300 schrieb Tareq Al Jurf:
2009/10/14 Christoph Wickert christoph.wickert@googlemail.com
The number of Ambassadors has decreased, but their quality has increased. How would you measure quality by numbers?
Exactly I've noticed that the ambassadors available now have full profiles and are very active Before that i used to find ambassadors that have only a couple of words on their profiles. But now whenever Joerg Simon sends a welcome message, i like to see their profiles a lot better and productive than before.
You see, this is something we actually *can* measure and we see that the new mentoring program bears fruit. Glad to hear that, so I don't really care about a few inactive ambassadors being removed and some numbers going down for a month.
Yes this is good. But the mentoring program and/or ambassador program is
just an example of the data which has been provided. We can do this for other parts of the project and for a collective way of measurement for other things :)
Regards, Christoph
-- Fedora-marketing-list mailing list Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list