Hi,
do not know if I should send that to discourse or here, but I stumbled on this https://lwn.net/Articles/836318/
this comment speak of license of fedora magazine being unclear (due to ToS), maybe some should be clarified in the template.
Also, this date back to 2013, it still reference the old RH HQ location, we moved since, so at least, that part should be updated ?
The terms and conditions on the site make it very clear that content not marked otherwise is CC BY-SA 3.0. Can you be more specific about what is unclear?
Keep in mind we do not want to make an additional mark on individual pages or stories about the licensing terms. That would inevitably conflict with having a single T&C that explains everything.
On Fri, Nov 6, 2020, 9:44 AM Michael Scherer mscherer@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
do not know if I should send that to discourse or here, but I stumbled on this https://lwn.net/Articles/836318/
this comment speak of license of fedora magazine being unclear (due to ToS), maybe some should be clarified in the template.
Also, this date back to 2013, it still reference the old RH HQ location, we moved since, so at least, that part should be updated ?
-- Michael Scherer / He/Il/Er/Él Sysadmin, Community Infrastructure
Fedora Magazine mailing list -- magazine@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to magazine-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/magazine@lists.fedoraproject.o...
Actually, let's not discuss on this list because it's not the one we really use these days. Go to Discourse and feel free to follow and join in there -- thanks!
On Fri, Nov 6, 2020 at 12:02 PM Paul Frields stickster@gmail.com wrote:
The terms and conditions on the site make it very clear that content not marked otherwise is CC BY-SA 3.0. Can you be more specific about what is unclear?
Keep in mind we do not want to make an additional mark on individual pages or stories about the licensing terms. That would inevitably conflict with having a single T&C that explains everything.
On Fri, Nov 6, 2020, 9:44 AM Michael Scherer mscherer@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
do not know if I should send that to discourse or here, but I stumbled on this https://lwn.net/Articles/836318/
this comment speak of license of fedora magazine being unclear (due to ToS), maybe some should be clarified in the template.
Also, this date back to 2013, it still reference the old RH HQ location, we moved since, so at least, that part should be updated ?
-- Michael Scherer / He/Il/Er/Él Sysadmin, Community Infrastructure
Fedora Magazine mailing list -- magazine@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to magazine-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/magazine@lists.fedoraproject.o...
Le vendredi 06 novembre 2020 à 12:02 -0500, Paul Frields a écrit :
The terms and conditions on the site make it very clear that content not marked otherwise is CC BY-SA 3.0. Can you be more specific about what is unclear?
I am just the messenger, the person who do not find clarity is the comment poster on LWN.
But I will repost on discourse, sure, I wasn't sure if this was just for editorial proposal or not.
Keep in mind we do not want to make an additional mark on individual pages or stories about the licensing terms. That would inevitably conflict with having a single T&C that explains everything.
Looks like the discussion is already on discourse, you can follow here: https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/improving-license-text/24430
On Fri, Nov 6, 2020, 1:21 PM Michael Scherer mscherer@redhat.com wrote:
Le vendredi 06 novembre 2020 à 12:02 -0500, Paul Frields a écrit :
The terms and conditions on the site make it very clear that content not marked otherwise is CC BY-SA 3.0. Can you be more specific about what is unclear?
I am just the messenger, the person who do not find clarity is the comment poster on LWN.
But I will repost on discourse, sure, I wasn't sure if this was just for editorial proposal or not.
Keep in mind we do not want to make an additional mark on individual pages or stories about the licensing terms. That would inevitably conflict with having a single T&C that explains everything.
-- Michael Scherer / He/Il/Er/Él Sysadmin, Community Infrastructure
magazine@lists.fedoraproject.org