Part 2 has been updated to clarify the objectives and tasks presented
in part 1. Let me know if you feel it requires further revisions.
Regards,
Shaun Assam
On Thu, 2017-11-30 at 15:15 +0000, Shaun Assam wrote:
Hi Paul, I've noticed the comments and have responded to them. I
knew
going into the article some people might not understand the
technicalities of optimizing sound quality. The comments and feedback
have helped with clarifying that for the average audio listener.
It seems there's a blur between the lines. The sentence begining
with,
“By eliminating Pulseaudio…” should be a new paragraph. Are we able
to
fix this post-publish?
I will review part 2 tonight and add a recap in the beginning briefly
explaining the purpose for the audio tweaking from part 1 and it's
relation to the second part.
Regards,
Shaun Assam
On Wed, 2017-11-29 at 17:07 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 03:08:18PM +0000, Shaun Assam wrote:
> > Hi Paul,
> >
> > Part 2 of the DIY Digital Jukebox article is ready for review at
> > https:
> > //fedoramagazine.org/?p=19529&preview=1&_ppp=836e4b4558
> >
> > Let me know if it requires additional editing.
>
> Thank you Shaun. There seem to be a number of comments on Part 1
> which it may be helpful for you to review and comment on.
>
> For instance, it's not clear to people yet why the real-time
> component
> is important for the jukebox. So that would be something you'll
> want
> to cover in Part 2 for sure.
>
_______________________________________________
Fedora Magazine mailing list -- magazine(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to magazine-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.or
g