----- Original Message -----
> I have just published a 0.1 of ceelog/libceelog ...
looking at the recent CEE discussion list activity, this was probably
premature, and it would be better to rename this package before too
many people start relying on the cee* name.
I share this feeling, and the same concern...
Any opinions? I'm considering {lib,}ljlog, or perhaps even
libljlog
and /usr/bin/lj.
I am currently using CEE/lumberjack in rsyslog doc and think about switching to either
lumberjack only or "structured logging". Structured logging is probably up to
the point, but jlog alos makes a lot of sense. Sorry, no clear vote from me. But it
definitely makes sense that everyone uses the same terms. In that sense, lumberjack may
make most sense -- and as such ljlog.
Rainer