My vote is to keep our development efforts separate from the CEE name for now. While most of it has settled, there is too much potential for flux as the effort has departed from trying to standardize on a minimal log format and trying shoehorn in additional requirements.
Let's aim to keep our implementation simpler and focus on an implementation that solves our logging problems. An implementation that deviates from an unimplemented standard is better than no implementation at all.
On Fri, 2012-10-05 at 19:16 +0000, Rainer Gerhards wrote:
----- Original Message -----
I have just published a 0.1 of ceelog/libceelog ...
looking at the recent CEE discussion list activity, this was probably premature, and it would be better to rename this package before too many people start relying on the cee* name.
I share this feeling, and the same concern...
Any opinions? I'm considering {lib,}ljlog, or perhaps even libljlog and /usr/bin/lj.
I am currently using CEE/lumberjack in rsyslog doc and think about switching to either lumberjack only or "structured logging". Structured logging is probably up to the point, but jlog alos makes a lot of sense. Sorry, no clear vote from me. But it definitely makes sense that everyone uses the same terms. In that sense, lumberjack may make most sense -- and as such ljlog.
Rainer _______________________________________________ lumberjack-developers mailing list lumberjack-developers@lists.fedorahosted.org https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/lumberjack-developers