Pascal Calarco had repeatedly tested FWN content for us on Insight. Pascal, there's no reason to think anything's changed radically, but are you prepared to get the most recent copy of FWN up on Insight if we have it available in the next week or so?
Hi Paul and all --
Yes, absolutely. I have been keeping track of how long it takes to republish FWN from the wiki to FI and it takes about 20-30 minutes per issue for the editor, which is nothing, basically. From this issue forward I can commit to getting FWN in there, and go back several issues where we've had a lapse, as I am done with my major travel for a bit now. I apologize not being more involved, but time opens up more for me now. Thanks!
- pascal
On 06/09/2010 02:07 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
Pascal Calarco had repeatedly tested FWN content for us on Insight. Pascal, there's no reason to think anything's changed radically, but are you prepared to get the most recent copy of FWN up on Insight if we have it available in the next week or so?
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 03:29:15PM -0400, Pascal Calarco wrote:
On 06/09/2010 02:07 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
Pascal Calarco had repeatedly tested FWN content for us on Insight. Pascal, there's no reason to think anything's changed radically, but are you prepared to get the most recent copy of FWN up on Insight if we have it available in the next week or so?
Hi Paul and all --
Yes, absolutely. I have been keeping track of how long it takes to republish FWN from the wiki to FI and it takes about 20-30 minutes per issue for the editor, which is nothing, basically. From this issue forward I can commit to getting FWN in there, and go back several issues where we've had a lapse, as I am done with my major travel for a bit now. I apologize not being more involved, but time opens up more for me now. Thanks!
Pascal, this is great news (ha, "news"!). I'm not sure there's a need to go back several issues, but I'm overjoyed to hear that bringing FWN to FI will not be a big hassle.
Okay, one issue that prevents me from republishing FWN to FI, logged in as my regular FAS creds.
When I log in now, there is no link to the admin panel. Could I either be added to the admin group or have a link to the admin panel added somewhere in the UI? Thanks!
- pascal
On 6/9/2010 9:44 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 03:29:15PM -0400, Pascal Calarco wrote:
On 06/09/2010 02:07 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
Pascal Calarco had repeatedly tested FWN content for us on Insight. Pascal, there's no reason to think anything's changed radically, but are you prepared to get the most recent copy of FWN up on Insight if we have it available in the next week or so?
Hi Paul and all --
Yes, absolutely. I have been keeping track of how long it takes to republish FWN from the wiki to FI and it takes about 20-30 minutes per issue for the editor, which is nothing, basically. From this issue forward I can commit to getting FWN in there, and go back several issues where we've had a lapse, as I am done with my major travel for a bit now. I apologize not being more involved, but time opens up more for me now. Thanks!
Pascal, this is great news (ha, "news"!). I'm not sure there's a need to go back several issues, but I'm overjoyed to hear that bringing FWN to FI will not be a big hassle.
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 10:33 PM, Pascal Calarco pcalarco@nd.edu wrote:
Okay, one issue that prevents me from republishing FWN to FI, logged in as my regular FAS creds.
When I log in now, there is no link to the admin panel. Could I either be added to the admin group or have a link to the admin panel added somewhere in the UI? Thanks!
Are you logging in to publictest6?
Paul
On 06/10/2010 08:02 AM, Paul Frields wrote:
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 10:33 PM, Pascal Calarcopcalarco@nd.edu wrote:
Okay, one issue that prevents me from republishing FWN to FI, logged in as my regular FAS creds.
When I log in now, there is no link to the admin panel. Could I either be added to the admin group or have a link to the admin panel added somewhere in the UI? Thanks!
Are you logging in to publictest6?
Paul
Yes. I have logged a new ticket on this:
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/2215
This was included as a need on one of the older zikula design tickets, but I can't seem to put my finger on that now.
I'll add this to the /wiki/Fedora_Insight page as well. Thanks!
- pascal
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 09:06:13AM -0400, Pascal Calarco wrote:
On 06/10/2010 08:02 AM, Paul Frields wrote:
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 10:33 PM, Pascal Calarcopcalarco@nd.edu wrote:
Okay, one issue that prevents me from republishing FWN to FI, logged in as my regular FAS creds.
When I log in now, there is no link to the admin panel. Could I either be added to the admin group or have a link to the admin panel added somewhere in the UI? Thanks!
Are you logging in to publictest6?
Paul
Yes. I have logged a new ticket on this:
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/2215
This was included as a need on one of the older zikula design tickets, but I can't seem to put my finger on that now.
I'll add this to the /wiki/Fedora_Insight page as well. Thanks!
Pascal, I answered the ticket -- we had decided some time ago in one of the Insight meetings to use a simple "all or nothing" approach to admin access for now. The AuthFAS module only supports one admin group now, but it *is* possible for it to support more in a later release. I think that was the cause of the problem or misunderstanding. You are in the 'cmsadmin' group on pt3's FakeFAS system now, and you should be able to edit content and do other admin tasks as needed.
On 6/10/2010 7:09 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
Yes. I have logged a new ticket on this:
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/2215
This was included as a need on one of the older zikula design tickets, but I can't seem to put my finger on that now.
I'll add this to the /wiki/Fedora_Insight page as well. Thanks!
Pascal, I answered the ticket -- we had decided some time ago in one of the Insight meetings to use a simple "all or nothing" approach to admin access for now. The AuthFAS module only supports one admin group now, but it *is* possible for it to support more in a later release. I think that was the cause of the problem or misunderstanding. You are in the 'cmsadmin' group on pt3's FakeFAS system now, and you should be able to edit content and do other admin tasks as needed
Awesome, thank you, Paul. I updated the FI wiki page and removed 2115, but opened a new ticket:
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/2217
The form has been changed so that the area for the beat is far too small; screenshot is attached in the ticket. Thanks!
I have the individual beats in pt6 for FWN 229 and can edit these once the textarea on the form is enlarged. I suggested a reasonable size of 80 chars x 20 rows. Thanks!
- pascal
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 07:51:54PM -0400, Pascal Calarco wrote:
On 6/10/2010 7:09 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
Yes. I have logged a new ticket on this:
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/2215
This was included as a need on one of the older zikula design tickets, but I can't seem to put my finger on that now.
I'll add this to the /wiki/Fedora_Insight page as well. Thanks!
Pascal, I answered the ticket -- we had decided some time ago in one of the Insight meetings to use a simple "all or nothing" approach to admin access for now. The AuthFAS module only supports one admin group now, but it *is* possible for it to support more in a later release. I think that was the cause of the problem or misunderstanding. You are in the 'cmsadmin' group on pt3's FakeFAS system now, and you should be able to edit content and do other admin tasks as needed
Awesome, thank you, Paul. I updated the FI wiki page and removed 2115, but opened a new ticket:
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/2217
The form has been changed so that the area for the beat is far too small; screenshot is attached in the ticket. Thanks!
I have the individual beats in pt6 for FWN 229 and can edit these once the textarea on the form is enlarged. I suggested a reasonable size of 80 chars x 20 rows. Thanks!
It doesn't seem obvious to me where to do that -- I spent a few minutes looking through the Pagemaster area for the FWN pubtype without any luck. Perhaps this has to go in the CSS for that form field. Can someone advise?
On 06/15/2010 09:36 AM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 07:51:54PM -0400, Pascal Calarco wrote:
On 6/10/2010 7:09 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
Yes. I have logged a new ticket on this:
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/2215
This was included as a need on one of the older zikula design tickets, but I can't seem to put my finger on that now.
I'll add this to the /wiki/Fedora_Insight page as well. Thanks!
Pascal, I answered the ticket -- we had decided some time ago in one of the Insight meetings to use a simple "all or nothing" approach to admin access for now. The AuthFAS module only supports one admin group now, but it *is* possible for it to support more in a later release. I think that was the cause of the problem or misunderstanding. You are in the 'cmsadmin' group on pt3's FakeFAS system now, and you should be able to edit content and do other admin tasks as needed
Awesome, thank you, Paul. I updated the FI wiki page and removed 2115, but opened a new ticket:
https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/2217
The form has been changed so that the area for the beat is far too small; screenshot is attached in the ticket. Thanks!
I have the individual beats in pt6 for FWN 229 and can edit these once the textarea on the form is enlarged. I suggested a reasonable size of 80 chars x 20 rows. Thanks!
It doesn't seem obvious to me where to do that -- I spent a few minutes looking through the Pagemaster area for the FWN pubtype without any luck. Perhaps this has to go in the CSS for that form field. Can someone advise?
The other functionality that has disappeared along the way was integration of the Xinhua javascript toolbar in the form UI. Simon had put this in place at FUDCon Toronto back in December and it was really useful for making things more aesthetically pleasing and consistent for headings, bolding and embedded links. I'll add this as a comment to the existing ticket. Thanks!
- pascal
It doesn't seem obvious to me where to do that -- I spent a few minutes looking through the Pagemaster area for the FWN pubtype without any luck. Perhaps this has to go in the CSS for that form field. Can someone advise?
The size can be controlled in the input templates in config/templates/pagemaster/input (from memory).
Xinha should "just work" - I'll try and find out why it has disappeared...
The other functionality that has disappeared along the way was integration of the Xinhua javascript toolbar in the form UI. Simon had put this in place at FUDCon Toronto back in December and it was really useful for making things more aesthetically pleasing and consistent for headings, bolding and embedded links. I'll add this as a comment to the existing ticket. Thanks!
So it looks like we're missing a bunch of the javascript libraries on PT6. I can't check in more detail on my current machine, but I'd guess that the symlink that was in javascript/editors pointing to the installation of xinha is no longer there (perhaps as part of the upgrade?).
Also, the calendar libraries which control the datepickers in the input form have also disappeared. As a result, the popup calendar doesn't pop up any more.
Would someone with access be able to check whether the javascript directory on pt6 is intact?
In fact, there was some stuff missing and smooge recovered xinha to its place.
Now, it's needed to include the custom PageMaster workflows. I've commited them into the fedora-zikula repo, so all the custom code will be there (with AuthFAS) and the custom theme on fedora-insight-theme.
The theme needs to be synced on pt6 too, the GIT copy has fixes and improvements ;) Greetings
Mateo Mis principios... son mis fines
Many thanks, Mateo!
- pascal
On 06/15/2010 10:23 PM, Mateo TibaPalacios wrote:
In fact, there was some stuff missing and smooge recovered xinha to its place.
Now, it's needed to include the custom PageMaster workflows. I've commited them into the fedora-zikula repo, so all the custom code will be there (with AuthFAS) and the custom theme on fedora-insight-theme.
The theme needs to be synced on pt6 too, the GIT copy has fixes and improvements ;) Greetings
Mateo Mis principios... son mis fines
logistics@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Mateo TibaPalacios -
Pascal Calarco -
Paul W. Frields -
Simon Birtwistle