I'll be tied up during our normal Insight meeting time this week, because I'll be at the Red Hat Summit.
Can we look over the meeting notes to see where we stand with "stuff to do," and whether we're making appropriate progress?
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-mktg/2010-06-17/fedora-mktg.2010-06-...
Thanks especially to Smooge who had a hard week last week, and still managed to find time to help us with Zikula. Smooge, is there something the rest of us could be doing to make that work easier? Should we be raising specific issues on the infrastructure list, or do you feel like your being our point of contact is sufficient already?
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 9:43 AM, Paul W. Frields stickster@gmail.com wrote:
I'll be tied up during our normal Insight meeting time this week, because I'll be at the Red Hat Summit.
Can we look over the meeting notes to see where we stand with "stuff to do," and whether we're making appropriate progress?
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-mktg/2010-06-17/fedora-mktg.2010-06-...
Thanks especially to Smooge who had a hard week last week, and still managed to find time to help us with Zikula. Smooge, is there something the rest of us could be doing to make that work easier? Should we be raising specific issues on the infrastructure list, or do you feel like your being our point of contact is sufficient already?
I need to work out with Mike on that part to make sure I am not causing any issues by being sole point of contact. After that I need to work on getting some RPM packages so that insight possibly works on staging again.
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Stephen John Smoogen smooge@gmail.com wrote:
I need to work out with Mike on that part to make sure I am not causing any issues by being sole point of contact. After that I need to work on getting some RPM packages so that insight possibly works on staging again.
What do you need RPMs of?
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 10:48 AM, David Nalley david@gnsa.us wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Stephen John Smoogen smooge@gmail.com wrote:
I need to work out with Mike on that part to make sure I am not causing any issues by being sole point of contact. After that I need to work on getting some RPM packages so that insight possibly works on staging again.
What do you need RPMs of?
Make sure that zikula-module-fedora-fasauth-0.3-2.el5.fedora.infra.noarch.rpm is the latest one of those, and an updated zikula-fedora-theme-1.1-1.el5.fedora.infra.noarch
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 11:53:46AM -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 10:48 AM, David Nalley david@gnsa.us wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Stephen John Smoogen smooge@gmail.com wrote:
I need to work out with Mike on that part to make sure I am not causing any issues by being sole point of contact. After that I need to work on getting some RPM packages so that insight possibly works on staging again.
What do you need RPMs of?
Make sure that zikula-module-fedora-fasauth-0.3-2.el5.fedora.infra.noarch.rpm is the latest one of those,
Would this be 0.4 instead, which is the branch I just created based on the fixes that mateo collected?
and an updated zikula-fedora-theme-1.1-1.el5.fedora.infra.noarch
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Paul W. Frields stickster@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 11:53:46AM -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 10:48 AM, David Nalley david@gnsa.us wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Stephen John Smoogen smooge@gmail.com wrote:
I need to work out with Mike on that part to make sure I am not causing any issues by being sole point of contact. After that I need to work on getting some RPM packages so that insight possibly works on staging again.
What do you need RPMs of?
Make sure that zikula-module-fedora-fasauth-0.3-2.el5.fedora.infra.noarch.rpm is the latest one of those,
Would this be 0.4 instead, which is the branch I just created based on the fixes that mateo collected?
Quite probably. I have been treating the packages as black boxes for better or for worse.
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 03:10:40PM -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Paul W. Frields stickster@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 11:53:46AM -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 10:48 AM, David Nalley david@gnsa.us wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Stephen John Smoogen smooge@gmail.com wrote:
I need to work out with Mike on that part to make sure I am not causing any issues by being sole point of contact. After that I need to work on getting some RPM packages so that insight possibly works on staging again.
What do you need RPMs of?
Make sure that zikula-module-fedora-fasauth-0.3-2.el5.fedora.infra.noarch.rpm is the latest one of those,
Would this be 0.4 instead, which is the branch I just created based on the fixes that mateo collected?
Quite probably. I have been treating the packages as black boxes for better or for worse.
I could be wrong -- but I think that packages dealing with FAS authentication aren't usually published in the general repositories. David Nalley provides SRPMs at: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/
The specfile in the SRPM will probably require a few changes for a 0.4-1 release, since mateo rearranged the tree in the git repository in a more logical fashion. Do we know who's going to do that?
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Paul W. Frields stickster@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 03:10:40PM -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Paul W. Frields stickster@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 11:53:46AM -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 10:48 AM, David Nalley david@gnsa.us wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Stephen John Smoogen smooge@gmail.com wrote:
I need to work out with Mike on that part to make sure I am not causing any issues by being sole point of contact. After that I need to work on getting some RPM packages so that insight possibly works on staging again.
What do you need RPMs of?
Make sure that zikula-module-fedora-fasauth-0.3-2.el5.fedora.infra.noarch.rpm is the latest one of those,
Would this be 0.4 instead, which is the branch I just created based on the fixes that mateo collected?
Quite probably. I have been treating the packages as black boxes for better or for worse.
I could be wrong -- but I think that packages dealing with FAS authentication aren't usually published in the general repositories. David Nalley provides SRPMs at: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/
The specfile in the SRPM will probably require a few changes for a 0.4-1 release, since mateo rearranged the tree in the git repository in a more logical fashion. Do we know who's going to do that?
I was going to try and get this done last night, but ran out of time. I'll try and get it done today.
On Tue, 22 Jun 2010, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 03:10:40PM -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Paul W. Frields stickster@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 11:53:46AM -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 10:48 AM, David Nalley david@gnsa.us wrote:
On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Stephen John Smoogen smooge@gmail.com wrote:
I need to work out with Mike on that part to make sure I am not causing any issues by being sole point of contact. After that I need to work on getting some RPM packages so that insight possibly works on staging again.
What do you need RPMs of?
Make sure that zikula-module-fedora-fasauth-0.3-2.el5.fedora.infra.noarch.rpm is the latest one of those,
Would this be 0.4 instead, which is the branch I just created based on the fixes that mateo collected?
Quite probably. I have been treating the packages as black boxes for better or for worse.
I could be wrong -- but I think that packages dealing with FAS authentication aren't usually published in the general repositories. David Nalley provides SRPMs at: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/
The specfile in the SRPM will probably require a few changes for a 0.4-1 release, since mateo rearranged the tree in the git repository in a more logical fashion. Do we know who's going to do that?
This is correct. For stuff that is generally only going to be used by us, we decided it best not to clutter up the Fedora repo. But anything that could feasibly be used by others (like the non-FAS code) should probably be packaged if it has an actual upstream and such.
-Mike
BTW, I just released PageMaster 0.4 officially [1] So it's ready to be packed and used on STG :)
[1] http://community.zikula.org/module-Extensions-display-ot-component-component...
Mateo Mis principios... son mis fines
Due to a couple of bugs reported by the PageMaster users, I've posted a bugfix release (version 0.4.1) on out extensions database [1]
Sorry to bother... we dealed with a working module for 1.2.3 and the upcoming 1.3 core version, and there was a couple of bugs doing that compatibility stuff. Greetings and I wait for news to check stg again.
[1] http://community.zikula.org/module-Extensions-display-ot-component-component...
Mateo Mis principios... son mis fines
logistics@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
David Nalley -
David Nalley -
Mateo TibaPalacios -
Mike McGrath -
Paul W. Frields -
Stephen John Smoogen