Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 06:00:58PM CET, olichtne(a)redhat.com wrote:
would it be more universal to just link the full flow_results object
instead? Could make it easier to access additional information if
required for post processing or analysis.
-Ondrej
Good idea. I will send v2.
Thanks for checking!
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 05:25:34PM +0100, Jan Tluka wrote:
> To be able to get additional information about the nature of the Flow result
> a reference to the Flow is added to result data.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Tluka <jtluka(a)redhat.com>
> ---
> lnst/RecipeCommon/Perf/Measurements/BaseFlowMeasurement.py | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/lnst/RecipeCommon/Perf/Measurements/BaseFlowMeasurement.py
b/lnst/RecipeCommon/Perf/Measurements/BaseFlowMeasurement.py
> index 9cc91ab5..c5e65044 100644
> --- a/lnst/RecipeCommon/Perf/Measurements/BaseFlowMeasurement.py
> +++ b/lnst/RecipeCommon/Perf/Measurements/BaseFlowMeasurement.py
> @@ -302,7 +302,8 @@ class BaseFlowMeasurement(BaseMeasurement):
> generator_flow_data=generator,
> generator_cpu_data=generator_cpu,
> receiver_flow_data=receiver,
> - receiver_cpu_data=receiver_cpu))
> + receiver_cpu_data=receiver_cpu,
> + flow=flow_results.flow))
>
> def aggregate_results(self, old, new):
> aggregated = []
> --
> 2.26.2
> _______________________________________________
> LNST-developers mailing list -- lnst-developers(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to lnst-developers-leave(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/lnst-developers@lists.fedora...
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure