On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 15:26:35 +0200, Alan Pevec apevec@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Bruno Wolff III bruno@wolff.to wrote:
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 19:50:56 -0700, Jasper Hartline jasper.hartline@gmail.com wrote: Does anyone see any problems with also using -l on the file system umounts? While those aren't currently a problem, I think we want the same safety there, so that mounts don't get left hanging.
It doesn't hurt in the regular case, but helps to clean up in the failure mode, so ACK from me. Please commit with the appropriate message, describing the issue and BZ# for the future reference. Thank you guys for tracking this down!
I have commited this change but haven't done a new build yet. I'd like to get the skipcopy patch reviewed and fix the recent error message handling bug that was reported first.