On 04/23/2012 06:18 PM, Yaniv Dary wrote:
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Juan Hernandez"<juan.hernandez(a)redhat.com>
> To: "Yaniv Dary"<ydary(a)redhat.com>
> Cc: "Tom Callaway"<tcallawa(a)redhat.com>,
legal(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 7:01:22 PM
> Subject: Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Packaging oVirt generated source
>
> On 04/23/2012 05:20 PM, Tom Callaway wrote:
>> On 04/23/2012 10:50 AM, Juan Hernandez wrote:
>>> We would like to package for fedora the Data Ware House component
>>> of
>>> oVirt, which contains parts generated using Talend Open Studio
>>> (see [1]).
>>>
>>> This tool allows the user to define graphically some data flows
>>> and
>>> transformations and then generates Java code. The generated Java
>>> code
>>> states in the header that the license is LGPL and the tool itself
>>> claims
>>> to be open source using GPL v2 (see [2]).
>>>
>>> Is it acceptable from the legal point of view to create a Fedora
>>> package
>>> using the generated Java code as the source?
>>
>> Is _all_ code generated via Talend Open Studio automatically marked
>> as
>> being LGPL, or is this a decision that the use generating the Java
>> code
>> makes consciously?
>
> I think that all the code is marked LGPL, there is no other
> alternative.
> Yaniv, can you confirm this?
This is correct.
Tom, did you get this response from Yaniv Dary? Any comments?