On 06/04/2012 10:31 AM, Juan Hernandez wrote:
On 04/23/2012 06:18 PM, Yaniv Dary wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Juan Hernandez"<juan.hernandez(a)redhat.com>
>> To: "Yaniv Dary"<ydary(a)redhat.com>
>> Cc: "Tom Callaway"<tcallawa(a)redhat.com>,
>> Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 7:01:22 PM
>> Subject: Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Packaging oVirt generated source
>> On 04/23/2012 05:20 PM, Tom Callaway wrote:
>>> On 04/23/2012 10:50 AM, Juan Hernandez wrote:
>>>> We would like to package for fedora the Data Ware House component
>>>> oVirt, which contains parts generated using Talend Open Studio
>>>> (see ).
>>>> This tool allows the user to define graphically some data flows
>>>> transformations and then generates Java code. The generated Java
>>>> states in the header that the license is LGPL and the tool itself
>>>> to be open source using GPL v2 (see ).
>>>> Is it acceptable from the legal point of view to create a Fedora
>>>> using the generated Java code as the source?
>>> Is _all_ code generated via Talend Open Studio automatically marked
>>> being LGPL, or is this a decision that the use generating the Java
>>> makes consciously?
>> I think that all the code is marked LGPL, there is no other
>> Yaniv, can you confirm this?
> This is correct.
Tom, did you get this response from Yaniv Dary? Any comments?
Anyone has an insight on where it is acceptable or not to package