Hi, someone has updated Paint-mono entry in the Wishlist with the following comment: "Cannot be included since Paint is partly licensed under a non-commercial license".
This is the paint-mono license: http://code.google.com/p/paint-mono/source/browse/trunk/src/Resources/Files/...
I think that the offending part is: * The Paint.NET logo and icon artwork are Copyright (C) Rick Brewster. They are covered by the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 license which is detailed here: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ . Permission is granted to use the logo and icon artwork in ways that discuss or promote Paint.NET (e.g. blog and news posts about Paint.NET, "Made with Paint.NET" watermarks or insets).
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs is a BAD license for content: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Bad_Licenses_3
But if the problem is only the logo and the icon, cannot they be replaced?
Bye,
Andrea.
On 2009-02-20 at 4:27:59 -0500, Andrea Musuruane musuruan@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, someone has updated Paint-mono entry in the Wishlist with the following comment: "Cannot be included since Paint is partly licensed under a non-commercial license".
This is the paint-mono license: http://code.google.com/p/paint-mono/source/browse/trunk/src/Resources/Files/...
I think that the offending part is:
- The Paint.NET logo and icon artwork are Copyright (C) Rick Brewster.
They are covered by the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 license which is detailed here: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ . Permission is granted to use the logo and icon artwork in ways that discuss or promote Paint.NET (e.g. blog and news posts about Paint.NET, "Made with Paint.NET" watermarks or insets).
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs is a BAD license for content: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Bad_Licenses_3
But if the problem is only the logo and the icon, cannot they be replaced?
If that is the only problem, then, yes.
~spot