I have not looked at the final draft, but as I understand it the purpose of
issuing eupl 1.1 was to make it osi compliant. So it *should* be good now.
On May 29, 2009 9:35 AM, "Caolán McNamara" <caolanm(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On this list previously the EUPL v1.0 was considered unacceptable for
Since then, there is now a EUPL v1.1, http://ec.europa.eu/idabc/eupl
does that fix the problems, or remain unacceptable ?
Assuming that the EUPL v1.1 remains unacceptable, can someone e.g. dual
licence something as EUPL v1.X and say LGPLv2 in order to make it
acceptable for us.
Fedora-legal-list mailing list