On Thu, 2018-01-11 at 21:00 -0600, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
On 2018-01-10 13:36, Tom Callaway wrote:
> On 01/10/2018 01:35 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > After move mp3 related packages to Fedora proper, we still have
> > twolame
> > and kwave to move or to review .
> >
> > I want focus on twolame [1] as state in [2] twolame is a MP2 (not
> > MP3)
> > encoder , is now eligible for a Fedora package or not ?
>
> twolame is fine for Fedora.
Great news, Tom, thanks!
Sérgio, are you planning on proposing twolame yourself? Once it's
in,
then the following packages could also use it:
* audacity (make all %{?_with_mp3} unconditional)
* gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-free (add BuildRequires: twolame-devel,
remove
--disable-twolame, update %files)
* sox (add BuildRequires: twolame-devel)
All this should be coordinated with the external repository which has
been supporting these.
(sorry fixing some typos)
Hello , if you add twolame to Fedora , you do me a big favor, I can
help you in review if no one review package for you.
I can coordinate the RPMFusion , but is not a big problem because we
just need bump one version on release of rpm.
Anyway while I'm typing, Zamir SUN appears with one package review !
The links for coordination with RPMFusion are here [1] and [2] , you
may drop a note there if I'm not tuned .
Bye, best regards and thanks.
[1]
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4459
[2]
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4754
--
Sérgio M. B.
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- legal(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to legal-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
--
Sérgio M. B.