On 11/03/2017 03:22 PM, Fernando Nasser wrote:
How should I proceed to get the CDDL 1.1 added to our list?
Should we make the new short name "CDDL 1.1" and leave the 1.0 one as
just "CDDL" or should we make it "CDDL 1.0" so packages using that
eventually get the License tag updated?
I've added CDDL 1.1 to the list (shortname "CDDL-1.1"), and relabeled
"CDDL" to "CDDL-1.0". I used the SPDX identifiers because there is no
reason not to do so here.
I'm also going to send an email to the devel list requesting that
maintainers of packages with the CDDL license tag revisit their package
to determine which version of CDDL is in use.