On 2019-03-14 6:06 a.m., Tom Callaway wrote:
That's just BSD.
Thanks Tom, I do see in
https://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-2-Clause
/Note: This license has also been called the "Simplified BSD License"
and the "FreeBSD License". See also the 3-clause BSD License
<
https://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-3-Clause>./
but this causes us some problems...
The licenses are collected automatically and included in the package
docs and there are instance like:
<packageName>liquid</packageName>
<version>0.1.0-1</version>
<licenses>
<license>
<name>BSD-2-Clause</name>
<
url>https://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-2-Clause</url>
and other similar entries with this license abbreviation.
The License: label has a and with the 3 licenses listed, and just BSD
will appear discrepant from what is included by the automatically
generated licenses file.
As
https://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-2-Clause got its own SPDX
identifier "BSD-2-Clause" could we not add it too?
Cheers,
Fernando
/
/
~tom
On Thu, Mar 14, 2019, 5:59 AM Fernando Nasser <fnasser(a)redhat.com
<mailto:fnasser@redhat.com>> wrote:
Hi,
Would it be possible to add to
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing#SoftwareLicenses
and corresponding databases the license:
BSD-2-Clause
https://opensource.org/licenses/BSD-2-Clause
Thanks!
P.S.: We currently have only BSD-2-Clause-Patent
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/BSD-2-Clause-Patent
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- legal(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
<mailto:legal@lists.fedoraproject.org>
To unsubscribe send an email to
legal-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
<mailto:legal-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org>
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/legal@lists.fedoraproject.org