On 02/06/2010 06:07 PM, Jon Stanley wrote:
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Tom "spot" Callaway
<tcallawa(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> Umm, why would you package something that only contained such a file?
> I'm assuming it points to PHP PEAR code, why aren't you packaging that?
I'm not packaging anything :)
I'm asking the question for David Nalley, who asked the question of
me. To directly answer the question though, the PHP packaging
guidelines seem to require this -
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:PHP#PEAR_Packages_from_a_non_sta...
and there are many examples already in the package collection:
Eh. Okay. Seems a silly thing to package standalone, but whatever. Use:
License: Public Domain
Since these channel files are not copyrightable, they can be treated as
if they were in the public domain.
~spot