On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 10:15:24AM -0400, Richard Fontana wrote:
> From a legal standpoint: a) does this make sense and b) what
would we
> need to do make it happen?
If the idea is to have a new secondary mark - I would suggest
discussing with the Red Hat legal team. If not, I'm not sure this is
really a legal issue (other than in the sense of refining what
'Fedora' means).
My preliminary questions are: a) do we _need_ a new secondary mark for
this, or is it something we can just declare without involving that;
and b) in either case, would we need to modify the existing trademark
guidelines or could this be an additive guideline?
--
Matthew Miller
<mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
Fedora Project Leader