On 09/14/2015 05:17 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 04:45:32PM -0500, inode0 wrote:
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Paul W. Frields stickster@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 09:00:18PM +0200, Haïkel wrote:
I'm curious to know how *Red Hat* products could depend on EPEL packages though EPEL is *not* supported by Red Hat.
This is not a valid assumption from what the OP said. An installation tool as he suggested could be independent of the product.
May I ask what is the legal concern here? Is there a legal issue I'm missing?
I just see EPEL policy questions really.
I don't see a clear legal question either, which I think is why someone asked previously for some more details. I see a packaging guidelines question as well as EPEL policy.
Correct. I assumed that such policy questions are settled on this list as well, to large degree at least. Am I wrong?