On 02/05/2010 06:37 PM, Jon Stanley wrote:
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Tom "spot" Callaway
> I'm going to say that the work you're describing is not copyrightable,
> thus, we don't need to worry too much about it being unlicensed.
Cool, what would a license tag for a package that contained only such a file be?
Umm, why would you package something that only contained such a file?
I'm assuming it points to PHP PEAR code, why aren't you packaging that?