On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 1:41 PM, Richard Fontana <rfontana@redhat.com> wrote:
That is possibly the worst-written license I have seen in quite some
time, but I actually think it is acceptable for Fedora for the reasons
Tom and Eric gave.

Thanks Richard and Tom! What should I use for the License tag in the RPM?

I've sent email to Bryan Sparks asking whether he is still in a position of authority to deal with CP/M licensing, and if so, whether he might grant a license under a common open source license; I suggested possibly BSD 2-clause.  However, I have no idea whether the email address I found for him will actually work.

In the mean time, I'm intending to package "z80pack" for Fedora. That includes emulation of various 8080 and Z80 systems. There are various disk images included. I'll put the CP/M images in a subpackage. I think there may be licensing issues with some of the other disk images, so I may have to produce a cleaned source tarball that omits those.

Best regards,
Eric