On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 01:46:05PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 10:58:09AM -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> > discussing with the Red Hat legal team. If not, I'm not sure this is
> > really a legal issue (other than in the sense of refining what
> > 'Fedora' means).
> AIUI this was about being able to use the *primary* marks in a
> controlled way, but Matthew can correct me if I'm wrong.
I freely admit to being unclear on the exact legal meaning there.
"Fedora Remix" is the current secondary mark, and also clearly includes
the primary "Fedora" trademark.
Because "Fedora Remix" is an inseparable unit, I wouldn't recommend
thinking of it this way. They are two different trademarks.
--
Paul W. Frields
http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://redhat.com/ - - - -
http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
The open source story continues to grow:
http://opensource.com