I think the packaging questions would be best addressed to the
packaging folks at packaging(a)lists.fp.o, and the EPEL stuff I believe
would go to epel-devel@.
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 3:29 PM, Florian Weimer <fweimer(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 09/14/2015 05:17 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 04:45:32PM -0500, inode0 wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Paul W. Frields <stickster(a)gmail.com>
>>> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 09:00:18PM +0200, Haïkel wrote:
>>>> I'm curious to know how *Red Hat* products
>>>> could depend on EPEL packages though EPEL
>>>> is *not* supported by Red Hat.
>>> This is not a valid assumption from what the OP said. An installation
>>> tool as he suggested could be independent of the product.
>> May I ask what is the legal concern here? Is there a legal issue I'm
>> I just see EPEL policy questions really.
> I don't see a clear legal question either, which I think is why
> someone asked previously for some more details. I see a packaging
> guidelines question as well as EPEL policy.
Correct. I assumed that such policy questions are settled on this list
as well, to large degree at least. Am I wrong?
Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security
legal mailing list