Hello
I have one question about one license previously marked as MIT.
On 3/25/15 13:47, Tom Callaway wrote:
On 03/13/2015 05:41 AM, Petr Šabata wrote:
> I found one more license in perl which I'm not sure about;
> according to the source comments, this comes from metamail:
> Copyright (c) 1991 Bell Communications Research, Inc.
(Bellcore)
> Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this material
for
> any purpose and without fee is hereby granted, provided that
the
> above copyright notice and this permission notice appear in
all
> copies, and that the name of Bellcore not be used in
advertising or
> publicity pertaining to this material without the specific,
prior
> written permission of an authorized representative of
Bellcore.
> BELLCORE MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS ABOUT THE ACCURACY OR
> SUITABILITY OF THIS MATERIAL FOR ANY PURPOSE. IT IS PROVIDED
"AS
> IS", WITHOUT ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES.
This is yet another MIT variant. Just use MIT here.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:MIT?rd=Licensing/MIT#Old_Style_(Bellcore_variant)
Shall I still use MIT or is it different license?
Full source:
https://github.com/Dual-Life/mime-base64/blob/master/Base64.xs
Thanks,
Jitka
~tom
==
Red Hat
> _______________________________________________
> legal mailing list
> legal@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/legal
--
Jitka Plesnikova
Senior Software Engineer
Red Hat