On 02/17/2010 02:07 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
I seem to recall we've had similar situations in the past, in
which an
email from at least one of the upstream lead maintainers clarifying
their intent sufficiently resolved the problem. Would it be difficult
to get such an email?
If upstream confirms (in writing) that this is a simple typo, then we're
okay, and we should get them to fix this upstream. If we don't want to
wait to pick up a new upstream fix, including a copy of the email
confirmation of licensing as %doc is sufficient.
~spot