On Di, 2010-03-16 at 21:33 +0100, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus wrote:
On Di, 2010-03-16 at 16:05 -0400, Tom "spot" Callaway
wrote:
> On 03/16/2010 03:40 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
[...]
> > Looking at the license at that URL, I see there's also the question of
> > the involvement of the sendmail license which has some rather odd GPL
> > compatibility issues.
>
> Yeah... but since the copyright holder is Sendmail, Inc on those files,
> we can assume that the Sendmail License is GPL compatible here (I'm also
> going to assume that any changes made by the The OpenDKIM Project to
> files originally under the Sendmail License are done under the BSD with
> advertising license).
That's true. OpenDKIM is a fork of a project called dkim-milter which is
orphaned at the moment and was developed by employees of Sendmail Inc.
and therefore shouldn't be a license problem. Only the changes made to
the forked project are licensed as BSD-with-advertisement.
> If I were you, I would ask the OpenDKIM project if they would be willing
> to drop the advertising clause.
I already sent an email to the project maintainer and hope to hear from
him soon.
After some discussion on their mailinglist they decided to drop the
4th-clause. I'm happy to see this decision and would like to thank
especially Tom since he could bring up some real good arguments against
the 4th-clause and helped out wherever he could!
Regards,
Stefan