Hi,
Need clarification on the License to be used for nesC [1] spec file:
The compiler is provided under GPLv2. But, the Java classes that
provide support for reading nesC's XML output are Copyright (c)
2004-2006 Intel Corporation. These were released under the Intel Open
Source License (now deprecated) [2]. In the latest CVS tree, it has
been updated:
http://nescc.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/nescc/nesc/COPYRIGHT?revision=1.3...
22 The Java classes that provide support for reading nesC's XML output are
23 Copyright (c) 2004-2006 Intel Corporation
24
25 These files are provided under a dual BSD/GPLv2 license. When using or
26 redistributing these files, you may do so under either license.
27
So, should I use "GPLv2 and GPLv2/BSD" in the License section of the .spec
file?
Appreciate your inputs,
Thanks!
SK
[1] nesC.
http://nescc.sourceforge.net/
[2] Bad licenses.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Bad_Licenses
--
Shakthi Kannan
http://www.shakthimaan.com