On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 10:33 AM, Ralph Bean <rbean(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 05:09:19PM -0700, Mike Bonnet wrote:
> Hi! As an exercise, I looked in to what it would take to port Koji from PyGreSQL to
psycopg2. Turns out, it didn't take much at all:
> Now, do we think this is a good idea? I haven't done any performance testing, but
in general it seems like pycopg2 is better supported. Thoughts?
+1. I've been using psycopg2 (through sqlalchemy) for every project
over the last 5 years and haven't had a snag yet.
Agreed that psycopg2 is very stable in the places I've used it, and it
would be a fine fit for Koji.