On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 18:09 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 02:14:51PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 12:20 +0100, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
> > Hi,
> > On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 05:57 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > > Hm... but that isn't going to be very finely grained if I'm
> > > understanding you correctly. Basically you'd have a single commit
> > > the -rc patches, etc.
> > There's a tag for every single brew build at the very least. It's a
> > reasonable granularity, much finer than just once per RC.
> I didn't mean Fedora RCs. I mean the 2.6.x-rcN patches. Since those
> get applied from CVS as wholesale patches rather than a series of
> individual commits, the granularity for rawhide kernels and git bisect
> would be pretty low compared to using the actually upstream git tree.
But there's a build for each of for eg..
So the delta between git12 and rc5 is tiny.
We don't hop from one -rc to another directly, but track upstream daily.
(or almost daily).
Oh, duh. Yes, sorry for the noise.
Stephen, where is your script? If you could provide it somewhere I'd be
happy to play with it.