On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 06:31:04AM -0400, Kyle McMartin wrote:
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 09:43:40AM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> If that known-to-build version fails to build with 4.8.1 then sure,
> we appear to have an rpm regression no matter how unlikely it should
> seems to me given the changes in 4.8.0 -> 4.8.1. But until proven
> otherwise, I'd say the kernel.spec cleanup efforts have broken the
> noarch case. It's not exactly hard to break a spec of that
> complexity :)
Looking at rpm, I was inclined to agree, so I poked more. Looks like
davej's changes last week broke it somehow... I'll puzzle it out.
I don't see how. The man page generation part of the spec is no
different from what we have in F13. I've looked over the changes I did,
and don't see anything that would trigger that failure.
(not denying it caused it, it's possible I've overlooked something,
but I'm just not seeing it)