On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 3:29 PM, Peter Robinson
<pbrobinson(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
commit ac67590916a449d1e71a791f6a0c3688251ec074
Author: Peter Robinson <pbrobinson(a)gmail.com>
Date: Thu Oct 24 20:29:40 2013 +0100
Add patch for i.MX6 Utilite device dtb, drop old exynos patch
I thought we discussed on IRC that patches were going to get sent to
the list first?
diff --git a/config-arm-generic b/config-arm-generic
index 96a95e5..aaa88ee 100644
--- a/config-arm-generic
+++ b/config-arm-generic
@@ -114,8 +114,6 @@ CONFIG_MFD_CORE=m
CONFIG_SMC91X=m
CONFIG_SMC911X=m
-CONFIG_VIRTIO_CONSOLE=m
-
Why did this get dropped? The commit message doesn't say.
# CONFIG_CRYPTO_TEST is not set
# CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE is not set
# CONFIG_XEN is not set
diff --git a/kernel.spec b/kernel.spec
index d1ea97d..19e9e4e 100644
--- a/kernel.spec
+++ b/kernel.spec
@@ -675,7 +675,6 @@ Patch15000: nowatchdog-on-virt.patch
# lpae
Patch21001: arm-lpae-ax88796.patch
Patch21004: arm-sound-soc-samsung-dma-avoid-another-64bit-division.patch
-Patch21005: arm-exynos-mp.patch
# ARM omap
Patch21010: arm-omap-load-tfp410.patch
@@ -683,6 +682,10 @@ Patch21010: arm-omap-load-tfp410.patch
# ARM tegra
Patch21020: arm-tegra-usb-no-reset-linux33.patch
+# ARM i.MX6
+#
http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg08276.html
+Patch21030: arm-imx6-utilite.patch
The link to the discussion is nice and I appreciate it. Though it
shows that changes have been requested, the patch isn't queued, and it
isn't really fully reviewed.
I don't understand the urgency in adding something that doesn't appear
to be ready according to upstream. Can you elaborate?
josh