This patch has been submitted upstream but I don't know if it will get pulled in to Fedora through the normal channels prior to F10 or not. Without this patch Fedora 10 will not install on cciss which breaks nearly all HP server systems.
thanks,
- Doug
Doug Chapman wrote:
This patch has been submitted upstream but I don't know if it will get pulled in to Fedora through the normal channels prior to F10 or not. Without this patch Fedora 10 will not install on cciss which breaks nearly all HP server systems.
thanks,
I think it is important to get this in for HP systems (which I often use to test with)...
Chuck, Dave? Think we can take this one-liner in?
P.
- Doug
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] cciss: fix regression, sysfs symlink missing From: Mike Miller mike.miller@hp.com Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 13:46:49 -0500 To: Andrew Morton akpm@linux-foundation.org, JensAxboejens.axboe@oracle.com
To: Andrew Morton akpm@linux-foundation.org, JensAxboejens.axboe@oracle.com CC: LKML linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, LKML-scsi linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, dchapman@redhat.com, hare@novell.com, sandy.garza@hp.com, karen.skweres@hp.com
Patch 1 of 1
This patch fixes a regression where the device symlink to the pci address is not created. Offending commit 6ae5ce8e8d4de666f31286808d2285aa6a50fa40, cciss: rmove redundant code.
Please consider this for inclusion.
signed-off-by: Mike Miller mike.miller@hp.com
diff --git a/drivers/block/cciss.c b/drivers/block/cciss.c index 1e1f915..44fb98e 100644 --- a/drivers/block/cciss.c +++ b/drivers/block/cciss.c @@ -1365,6 +1365,7 @@ static void cciss_add_disk(ctlr_info_t *h, struct gendisk *disk, disk->first_minor = drv_index << NWD_SHIFT; disk->fops = &cciss_fops; disk->private_data = &h->drv[drv_index];
disk->driverfs_dev = &(hba[drv_index]->pdev->dev);
/* Set up queue information */ blk_queue_bounce_limit(disk->queue, h->pdev->dma_mask);
Fedora-kernel-list mailing list Fedora-kernel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-kernel-list
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 12:28 -0400, Prarit Bhargava wrote:
Doug Chapman wrote:
This patch has been submitted upstream but I don't know if it will get pulled in to Fedora through the normal channels prior to F10 or not. Without this patch Fedora 10 will not install on cciss which breaks nearly all HP server systems.
thanks,
I think it is important to get this in for HP systems (which I often use to test with)...
Chuck, Dave? Think we can take this one-liner in?
P.
Sorry, meant to include the BZ in the original email. It has been reported at least once. I have heard from several co-workers back in HP that have been blocked by this.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466181
- Doug
On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 12:39:55 -0400 Doug Chapman doug.chapman@hp.com wrote:
Sorry, meant to include the BZ in the original email. It has been reported at least once. I have heard from several co-workers back in HP that have been blocked by this.
Patch went in 2.6.27-15. I closed the bug too.
kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org