From: Fedora Kernel Team kernel-team@fedoraproject.org
Hi,
As part of the ongoing rebase effort, the following configuration options need to be reviewed.
As a reminder, the ARK configuration flow involves moving unreviewed configuration options from the pending directory to the ark directory. In the diff below, options are removed from the pending directory and added to the ark hierarchy. The final options that need to be ACKed are the files that are being added to the ark hierarchy.
If the value for a file that is added should be changed, please reply with a better option.
CONFIG_XFRM_USER_COMPAT:
Transformation(XFRM) user configuration interface like IPsec used by compatible Linux applications.
If unsure, say N.
Symbol: XFRM_USER_COMPAT [=n] Type : tristate Defined at net/xfrm/Kconfig:31 Prompt: Compatible ABI support Depends on: NET [=y] && INET [=y] && XFRM_USER [=y] && COMPAT_FOR_U64_ALIGNMENT [=y] && HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS [=y] Location: -> Networking support (NET [=y]) -> Networking options -> Transformation user configuration interface (XFRM_USER [=y]) Selects: WANT_COMPAT_NETLINK_MESSAGES [=n]
---
Cc: Jiri Benc jbenc@redhat.com Cc: Marcelo Leitner mleitner@redhat.com Cc: Davide Caratti dcaratti@redhat.com Cc: Eric Garver egarver@redhat.com Cc: Flavio Leitner fbl@redhat.com Cc: Florian Westphal fwestpha@redhat.com Cc: Guillaume Nault gnault@redhat.com Cc: Hangbin Liu haliu@redhat.com Cc: Ivan Vecera ivecera@redhat.com Cc: Jarod Wilson jarod@redhat.com Cc: Lorenzo Bianconi lorenzo.bianconi@redhat.com Cc: Paolo Abeni pabeni@redhat.com Cc: Phil Sutter psutter@redhat.com Cc: Sabrina Dubroca sdubroca@redhat.com Cc: Stefano Brivio sbrivio@redhat.com Cc: Xin Long lxin@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Fedora Kernel Team kernel-team@fedoraproject.org --- .../common/generic/CONFIG_XFRM_USER_COMPAT | 1 + .../generic/CONFIG_XFRM_USER_COMPAT | 21 ------------------- 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 21 deletions(-) create mode 100644 redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_XFRM_USER_COMPAT delete mode 100644 redhat/configs/pending-common/generic/CONFIG_XFRM_USER_COMPAT
diff --git a/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_XFRM_USER_COMPAT b/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_XFRM_USER_COMPAT new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..798d10e8e93e --- /dev/null +++ b/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_XFRM_USER_COMPAT @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +# CONFIG_XFRM_USER_COMPAT is not set diff --git a/redhat/configs/pending-common/generic/CONFIG_XFRM_USER_COMPAT b/redhat/configs/pending-common/generic/CONFIG_XFRM_USER_COMPAT deleted file mode 100644 index 7941fd360e9b..000000000000 --- a/redhat/configs/pending-common/generic/CONFIG_XFRM_USER_COMPAT +++ /dev/null @@ -1,21 +0,0 @@ -# CONFIG_XFRM_USER_COMPAT: -# -# Transformation(XFRM) user configuration interface like IPsec -# used by compatible Linux applications. -# -# If unsure, say N. -# -# Symbol: XFRM_USER_COMPAT [=n] -# Type : tristate -# Defined at net/xfrm/Kconfig:31 -# Prompt: Compatible ABI support -# Depends on: NET [=y] && INET [=y] && XFRM_USER [=y] && COMPAT_FOR_U64_ALIGNMENT [=y] && HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS [=y] -# Location: -# -> Networking support (NET [=y]) -# -> Networking options -# -> Transformation user configuration interface (XFRM_USER [=y]) -# Selects: WANT_COMPAT_NETLINK_MESSAGES [=n] -# -# -# -# CONFIG_XFRM_USER_COMPAT is not set
2020-10-19, 13:35:11 -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 03:29:58PM -0000, GitLab Bridge on behalf of jeremycline wrote:
--- /dev/null +++ b/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_XFRM_USER_COMPAT @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +# CONFIG_XFRM_USER_COMPAT is not set
Sabrina, thoughts?
That's for 32-bit userspace programs configuring IPsec on 64-bit kernels. I think it's ok to leave it off for now.
On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 11:58:59PM +0200, Sabrina Dubroca wrote:
2020-10-19, 13:35:11 -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 03:29:58PM -0000, GitLab Bridge on behalf of jeremycline wrote:
--- /dev/null +++ b/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_XFRM_USER_COMPAT @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +# CONFIG_XFRM_USER_COMPAT is not set
Sabrina, thoughts?
That's for 32-bit userspace programs configuring IPsec on 64-bit kernels. I think it's ok to leave it off for now.
Cool. Can you then please ack this change? :-)
Marcelo
2020-10-19, 19:16:40 -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 11:58:59PM +0200, Sabrina Dubroca wrote:
2020-10-19, 13:35:11 -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 03:29:58PM -0000, GitLab Bridge on behalf of jeremycline wrote:
--- /dev/null +++ b/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_XFRM_USER_COMPAT @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +# CONFIG_XFRM_USER_COMPAT is not set
Sabrina, thoughts?
That's for 32-bit userspace programs configuring IPsec on 64-bit kernels. I think it's ok to leave it off for now.
Cool. Can you then please ack this change? :-)
Acked-by: Sabrina Dubroca sdubroca@redhat.com
On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 11:58:59PM +0200, Sabrina Dubroca wrote:
2020-10-19, 13:35:11 -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 03:29:58PM -0000, GitLab Bridge on behalf of jeremycline wrote:
--- /dev/null +++ b/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_XFRM_USER_COMPAT @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +# CONFIG_XFRM_USER_COMPAT is not set
Sabrina, thoughts?
That's for 32-bit userspace programs configuring IPsec on 64-bit kernels. I think it's ok to leave it off for now.
Is that an ACK for the original patch?
Cheers, Don
kernel@lists.fedoraproject.org