On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 07:06:48PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> So that the userland package we build there is useful?
OK. Did it get tested?
No, it's not a code change on any supported architecture beyond ARM.
> If you want to drop it, drop it then.
>
>> Also, please post for review first.
>>
>
> As soon as you guys start? Given I was explicitly given commit access,
> and I'm not just running rampant with global commit permission or
> something, I am just fixing what I see needing to be fixed.
We have started. Any patch that doesn't have a bug attached to it and
isn't a rebase or config change has been posted here first for the
past few cases. If I've missed some, I'm as guilty as the next guy.
It's not about running rampant with commit permission. It's about
knowing where stuff is coming from and why.
Fine, whatever, given this is a requirement no other package seems to
have, I'm disinclined to contribute further. Congrats. Also, I think
documenting fixes to your patches beyond the %changelog is a waste of my
time given the general quality of the out of tree crap you've stuffed in
there already.
--Kyle