On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 09:52:44AM +0100, Oliver Falk wrote:
Oliver Falk wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Changed the subject, as happens that I oversee the mails :-(
> And this subject is more descriptive, isn't it?
>
> Kyle McMartin wrote:
> [ ... ]
>> This all looks fine to me.
>
> May I interpret this as a *GO*? :-)
>
> > Sorry to have been so blunt, but I'm fairly
>> new to Fedora, so I didn't know you were actually working on stuff, and
>> not just someone asking for random commit access.
>
> Don't worry. I didn't get this wrong. I can understand you where
> worrying. If I'd be in your position, I would react differently.
>
>> I wouldn't worry too much about the linux-2.6- namespace for patches,
>> I'd prefer if they were just alpha-$patch.patch. davej, thoughts?
>
> Whatever you prefer.
>
> Let me know, so I start working on this today...
Did I miss the answer to my mail!?
Sorry, I was on vacation, and it fell off my radar when I got back.
Looked ok to commit to me though iirc.
I've no really preference on patch naming. If you want to do alpha-*, go ahead.
but don't feel that you have to.
Dave
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk