* Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> actually, the current code works pretty well - and has been
brought
> to the extreme via PREEMPT_RT. It boots fine on SMP and elsewhere,
> and it finds us tons of bugs in every kernel release.
If you say so, I take it back.
CONFIG_PREEMPT alone is probably not worth having: it doesnt bring
enough to the table, has overhead and doesnt satisfy the low-latency
users. PREEMPT_RT is much nicer - but quite a bit more intrusive =B-)
Ingo