On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 2:08 PM, John Dulaney <jdulaney(a)gnu.org> wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 12:28:18PM -0700, Laura Abbott wrote:
> The secure boot patches have been around in the Fedora tree for a while now.
> They work well enough but there has not been much active work in getting
> them accepted upstream in recent years. The longer they exist out of tree
> the harder they get to maintain without extra support. If there isn't a
> path for the current secure boot patch set to be accepted upstream, we need
> to seriously consider if it's worth carrying long term.
>
> Thoughts?
So, how would we handle secure boot moving forward?
How are other distros handling this? Does upstream have an alternative?
--
Chris Murphy