Kyle McMartin wrote:
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 06:53:55AM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Subject: Re: de-modularising for the win!
> Message-ID: <20080920105355.GA6663(a)nostromo.devel.redhat.com>
> References: <20080918191355.GA9683(a)nostromo.devel.redhat.com>
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: inline
> In-Reply-To: <1221790735.15361.152.camel(a)aglarond.local>
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
> Jeremy Katz (katzj(a)redhat.com) said:
>> On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 16:13 -0700, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>>> - killing the initrd for that general 90% case can be a big win
>> Ermm, the general 90% (or some large-ish generalizing percentage) are
>> set up to use LVM. Which then requires an initrd.
> Yes, but ... LVM is overkill, in general. (That's another discussion.)
> On further consideration, though, the biggest issue with kicking out
> the initrd is getting the policy lodaed.
But, won't we all be using btrfs instead of lvm in F11? ;-)
Aw crap, you mean F10 was my only fleeting chance to make ext4 the