On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Bill Nottingham <notting(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Josh Boyer (jwboyer(a)fedoraproject.org) said:
> (As for memory-critical cloud... I have no idea what that is to be
> honest. All I hear from the cloud people is "smaller is better".
> Mostly that's image size, not memory overhead but I can imagine they
> want that limited as well.)
Admittedly, it's not the same as unswappable kernel memory, but I wonder if
for 2MB we can find that sort of working set size reductions in other places
on the cloud image.
Quite possibly so. I just hate to be wasteful if none of the 3
products clearly has a need. If 1024 is sufficient, we'll likely go