On 10/26/2010 04:03 PM, Roland McGrath wrote:
> Eh, okay. I was wondering if there was a way to conditionalize it
so it
> is only added in the kernel-smp case, but eh. Rationale accepted.
There surely is. Everyone loves my extra-hairy rpm spec macros so much
already, whatever arcanity that would require could not help but be beloved
far more than one redundant provide.
Yeah. I couldn't come up with a trivial method to do it either, so I'm
marking it as "safe to ignore".
~spot