On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 6:34 PM, Prarit Bhargava <prarit(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> Part of the problem with that idea is that the Pentium M laptops without
> PAE
> aren't that old. This might upset quite a few people.
>
>
Right -- and that's a good point to keep in mind. IMO we shouldn't break
*any* systems when we do this change.
Given the other information coming through (about dynamic kernel PAE
enable), should we really being doing this right now?
Why not wait for the dynamic PAE stuff to settle upstream and then make the
change? Then we can properly (IMO) drop kernel-PAE.686 and stick with
kernel.686.
dynamic PAE ?