On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 02:14:51PM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 12:20 +0100, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 05:57 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > Hm... but that isn't going to be very finely grained if I'm
> > understanding you correctly. Basically you'd have a single commit for
> > the -rc patches, etc.
> There's a tag for every single brew build at the very least. It's a
> reasonable granularity, much finer than just once per RC.
I didn't mean Fedora RCs. I mean the 2.6.x-rcN patches. Since those
get applied from CVS as wholesale patches rather than a series of
individual commits, the granularity for rawhide kernels and git bisect
would be pretty low compared to using the actually upstream git tree.
But there's a build for each of for eg..
So the delta between git12 and rc5 is tiny.
We don't hop from one -rc to another directly, but track upstream daily.
(or almost daily).