Hi there,
I fedup'ed my F21 (with plasma 5 from copr) to F22 which mostly went well. For a few packages, F21 was actually ahead of F22 (sigh) but dnf downgrade took care of that. There is one remaining piece in "dnf list extras":
plasma5-5.2.1-2.fc21.noarch
Erasing that takes quite a bit with it (see below).
Which package should obsolete it, and/or how do I get into a proper "F22 only plasma 5 state"?
(There are many other .fc21 packages, which is confusing but normal in fedora land; that plasma5 package should go away, though.)
Michael
kdeplasma-addons x86_64 5.4.1-1.fc22 @System 7.2 M khelpcenter x86_64 1:5.4.1-1.fc22 @System 4.0 M kinfocenter x86_64 5.4.1-1.fc22 @System 7.0 M kscreen x86_64 1:5.4.1-1.fc22 @System 733 k ksshaskpass x86_64 5.4.1-1.fc22 @System 88 k ksysguard x86_64 5.4.1-1.fc22 @System 2.5 M ksysguardd x86_64 5.4.1-1.fc22 @System 162 k oxygen-cursor-themes noarch 5.4.1-1.fc22 @System 14 M plasma-oxygen x86_64 5.4.1-1.fc22 @System 0 plasma-workspace-wallpapers noarch 5.4.1-1.fc22 @System 49 M plasma5 noarch 5.2.1-2.fc21 @System 0 qt4-style-oxygen x86_64 5.4.1-1.fc22 @System 1.2 M qt5-style-oxygen x86_64 5.4.1-1.fc22 @System 4.4 M sddm-kcm
You dodged a bullet... /dont/ upgrade to Plasma5! It's been a disaster. Wait until they fix all the bugs.
-e
On Fri, 2015-09-25 at 09:46 +0200, Michael J Gruber wrote:
Hi there,
I fedup'ed my F21 (with plasma 5 from copr) to F22 which mostly went well. For a few packages, F21 was actually ahead of F22 (sigh) but dnf downgrade took care of that. There is one remaining piece in "dnf list extras":
plasma5-5.2.1-2.fc21.noarch
Erasing that takes quite a bit with it (see below).
Which package should obsolete it, and/or how do I get into a proper "F22 only plasma 5 state"?
(There are many other .fc21 packages, which is confusing but normal in fedora land; that plasma5 package should go away, though.)
Michael
kdeplasma-addons x86_64 5.4.1-1.fc22 @System 7.2 M khelpcenter x86_64 1:5.4.1-1.fc22 @System 4.0 M kinfocenter x86_64 5.4.1-1.fc22 @System 7.0 M kscreen x86_64 1:5.4.1-1.fc22 @System 733 k ksshaskpass x86_64 5.4.1-1.fc22 @System 88 k ksysguard x86_64 5.4.1-1.fc22 @System 2.5 M ksysguardd x86_64 5.4.1-1.fc22 @System 162 k oxygen-cursor-themes noarch 5.4.1-1.fc22 @System 14 M plasma-oxygen x86_64 5.4.1-1.fc22 @System 0 plasma-workspace-wallpapers noarch 5.4.1-1.fc22 @System 49 M plasma5 noarch 5.2.1-2.fc21 @System 0 qt4-style-oxygen x86_64 5.4.1-1.fc22 @System 1.2 M qt5-style-oxygen x86_64 5.4.1-1.fc22 @System 4.4 M sddm-kcm
kde mailing list kde@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
The information contained in this transmission contains privileged and confidential information. It is intended only for the use of the person named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or duplication of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
CAUTION: Intended recipients should NOT use email communication for emergent or urgent health care matters.
Emilio Recio wrote:
You dodged a bullet... /dont/ upgrade to Plasma5! It's been a disaster. Wait until they fix all the bugs.
Fedora 22 is always Plasma 5, the issue here is that the metapackage from the Copr is now factually obsolete, but no RPM Obsoletes it.
Kevin Kofler
Kevin Kofler venit, vidit, dixit 26.09.2015 19:05:
Emilio Recio wrote:
You dodged a bullet... /dont/ upgrade to Plasma5! It's been a disaster. Wait until they fix all the bugs.
Fedora 22 is always Plasma 5, the issue here is that the metapackage from the Copr is now factually obsolete, but no RPM Obsoletes it.
So I guess rpm -e --nodeps is fine then. It's really more an issue of the copr repo, since F21 with plasma 5 from copr -> F22 is not an officially supported upgrade path.
Michael
Michael J Gruber wrote:
So I guess rpm -e --nodeps is fine then. It's really more an issue of the copr repo, since F21 with plasma 5 from copr -> F22 is not an officially supported upgrade path.
--nodeps shouldn't be needed, nothing should be depending on that obsolete package.
Kevin Kofler
Emilio,
as you can infer from my post, I voluntarily used plasma 5 on F21. It may have been a disaster for you but clearly wasn't for me. Besides, your suggestion is pointless - I'm on F22, as I wrote, with plasma 5 as the only KDE/plasma option.
Please take your plasma 5 criticism somewhere else than hijacking my thread. Thanks.
Michael
Emilio Recio venit, vidit, dixit 25.09.2015 19:05:
You dodged a bullet... /dont/ upgrade to Plasma5! It's been a disaster. Wait until they fix all the bugs.
-e
On Fri, 2015-09-25 at 09:46 +0200, Michael J Gruber wrote:
Hi there,
I fedup'ed my F21 (with plasma 5 from copr) to F22 which mostly went well. For a few packages, F21 was actually ahead of F22 (sigh) but dnf downgrade took care of that. There is one remaining piece in "dnf list extras":
plasma5-5.2.1-2.fc21.noarch
Erasing that takes quite a bit with it (see below).
Which package should obsolete it, and/or how do I get into a proper "F22 only plasma 5 state"?
(There are many other .fc21 packages, which is confusing but normal in fedora land; that plasma5 package should go away, though.)
Michael
kdeplasma-addons x86_64 5.4.1-1.fc22 @System 7.2 M khelpcenter x86_64 1:5.4.1-1.fc22 @System 4.0 M kinfocenter x86_64 5.4.1-1.fc22 @System 7.0 M kscreen x86_64 1:5.4.1-1.fc22 @System 733 k ksshaskpass x86_64 5.4.1-1.fc22 @System 88 k ksysguard x86_64 5.4.1-1.fc22 @System 2.5 M ksysguardd x86_64 5.4.1-1.fc22 @System 162 k oxygen-cursor-themes noarch 5.4.1-1.fc22 @System 14 M plasma-oxygen x86_64 5.4.1-1.fc22 @System 0 plasma-workspace-wallpapers noarch 5.4.1-1.fc22 @System 49 M plasma5 noarch 5.2.1-2.fc21 @System 0 qt4-style-oxygen x86_64 5.4.1-1.fc22 @System 1.2 M qt5-style-oxygen x86_64 5.4.1-1.fc22 @System 4.4 M sddm-kcm
kde mailing list kde@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
The information contained in this transmission contains privileged and confidential information. It is intended only for the use of the person named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or duplication of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
CAUTION: Intended recipients should NOT use email communication for emergent or urgent health care matters.
kde mailing list kde@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
I apologize. I was just suggesting on my experiences... at that time I was very frustrated with it. Not using plasma5 has eased my frustrations until all the bugs are fixed, and I can test it on my systems.
-e
On 09/29/15 04:18, Michael J Gruber wrote:
Emilio,
as you can infer from my post, I voluntarily used plasma 5 on F21. It may have been a disaster for you but clearly wasn't for me. Besides, your suggestion is pointless - I'm on F22, as I wrote, with plasma 5 as the only KDE/plasma option.
Please take your plasma 5 criticism somewhere else than hijacking my thread. Thanks.
Michael
Emilio Recio venit, vidit, dixit 25.09.2015 19:05:
You dodged a bullet... /dont/ upgrade to Plasma5! It's been a disaster. Wait until they fix all the bugs.
-e
On Fri, 2015-09-25 at 09:46 +0200, Michael J Gruber wrote:
Hi there,
I fedup'ed my F21 (with plasma 5 from copr) to F22 which mostly went well. For a few packages, F21 was actually ahead of F22 (sigh) but dnf downgrade took care of that. There is one remaining piece in "dnf list extras":
plasma5-5.2.1-2.fc21.noarch
Erasing that takes quite a bit with it (see below).
Which package should obsolete it, and/or how do I get into a proper "F22 only plasma 5 state"?
(There are many other .fc21 packages, which is confusing but normal in fedora land; that plasma5 package should go away, though.)
Michael
kdeplasma-addons x86_64 5.4.1-1.fc22 @System 7.2 M khelpcenter x86_64 1:5.4.1-1.fc22 @System 4.0 M kinfocenter x86_64 5.4.1-1.fc22 @System 7.0 M kscreen x86_64 1:5.4.1-1.fc22 @System 733 k ksshaskpass x86_64 5.4.1-1.fc22 @System 88 k ksysguard x86_64 5.4.1-1.fc22 @System 2.5 M ksysguardd x86_64 5.4.1-1.fc22 @System 162 k oxygen-cursor-themes noarch 5.4.1-1.fc22 @System 14 M plasma-oxygen x86_64 5.4.1-1.fc22 @System 0 plasma-workspace-wallpapers noarch 5.4.1-1.fc22 @System 49 M plasma5 noarch 5.2.1-2.fc21 @System 0 qt4-style-oxygen x86_64 5.4.1-1.fc22 @System 1.2 M qt5-style-oxygen x86_64 5.4.1-1.fc22 @System 4.4 M sddm-kcm
kde mailing list kde@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
The information contained in this transmission contains privileged and confidential information. It is intended only for the use of the person named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or duplication of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
CAUTION: Intended recipients should NOT use email communication for emergent or urgent health care matters.
kde mailing list kde@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org
kde mailing list kde@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/kde New to KDE4? - get help from http://userbase.kde.org